This is a fun exercise. You can write it so that every sentence runs into the last one as training. This sentence has to do with the former, and that's a platitude equivalent to the successive generation. You wonder how long this can go on for, and then remember Oedipus exists, and did the same thing in alternating lines. It's not hard. It's very difficult. Their eyes may peel for the page, but that's the reason two can be won by the word.
Now you may be wondering what the exact linguistic breakdown of this is, so let me demonstrate:
- This is a fun exer/cise. It cuts!
- You can write it so that every sentence runs into the last one as t/raining. It rains t!
- This setences has to do with the former, and that's a platitude equivalent to the successive generation. It kids!
"But isn't that just inferring things into the previous reading?" Only if you consider that this exercise isn't in English, it's grammatical-symbolic bound to the semantic rules of how those logical confines can be reasonably manipulated within the framework of ontological reduction. And that's why they shouldn't have deleted my nodes.